Plantinga claims to have shown that (5) is indeed possibly false, in what he calls the free will defense: the heart of the free will defense is the claim that it is possible that god could not have created a universe containing moral good without creating one that also contained moral evil.
The free will defense does not defeat the atheistic argument from evil. Against the free will defense by horia george plugaru posted june 7, 2004 discussion when it refers to the suffering caused by humans, the argument from evil (ae) runs briefly as follows. Plantinga on the free will defense hugh lafollette east tennessee state university i in his recent book god, freedom, and evil, alvin plantinga for.
An exposition and assessment of the free-will defence, the argument that god's failure to prevent moral evil is justified because in order to prevent it he would have to compromise our free-will.
Plantinga’s free will defense notre dame philosopher alvin plantinga strategy : “to show that a set, s , is consistent you think of a possible state of affairs (it needn’t actually obtain ) which. All that is needed to dispose of the charge of logical incoherence is to supply a logically possible, morally sufficient reason that a good god would allow evil (ie, a defense) note, this doesn’t have to be the actual reason god may have merely a possible one.
The free will defense suggests the possibility that, to god, humanity’s capacity to make moral choices is a higher priority—and a more important moral imperative—than a universe entirely free from evil. So plantinga is thursday, february 11, 2010 “the heart of the free will defense is the claim that it is possible that god could not have created a universe. This essay will take a look at the most common, and perhaps the only possible, counter-argument, the free-will defense [henceforth the fwd] in brief, it says that point 2 above is incorrect because suffering is a result of the free actions of human beings, created by god with a capacity to choose either good or evil. Alvin plantinga's free will defense is a logical argument developed by american analytic philosopher alvin plantinga, the john a o'brien professor of philosophy emeritus at the university of notre dame, and published in its final version in his 1977 book god, freedom, and evil.
The second way in which the free-will defence works is in justifying the existence of moral evil by justifying god’s creation of free agents the existence of moral evil, the free-will defence argues, is a consequence of the existence of a greater good: free will. The free will defense does not defeat the atheistic argument from evil you can dismiss the support request pop up for 4 weeks (28 days) if you want to be reminded again or you can dismiss until our next donations drive (typically at the beginning of october.
Although the free will defense, if it succeeds, might seem to help explain why an all-good god would have good reason to permit the evil that is a result of free human choice (moral evil,), it doesn't seem to cover so-called natural evil, eg, suffering caused by earthquakes, birth defects, etc, which doesn't result from free human choice.