Should the death penalty be banned as a form of punishment yes| no| 1 financial costs to taxpayers of capital punishment is several times that of keeping someone in prison for life 2 it is barbaric and violates the “cruel and unusual” clause in the bill of rights 3 the endless appeals and required additional [.
I don't know if you know this, but us taxpayer money goes to many things, one of which is the death penalty not only could the government save money, but also lives according to deathpenaltyinfoorg, cases without the death penalty cost $740,000, while cases where the death penalty is sought cost $126 million.
Yes it should be abolished for nearly all crimes except treason or espionage or all crimes i rule death penalty is unconstitutional and illegal it is banned in eu and ireland, canada, australia, new zealand, united kingdom and mexico and most south american countries. Yes, death penalty should banned i think that death penalty should be banned for a number of reasons some include: if they are killed then you have done no favor to the world as they will never learn from their mistakes however they should be put in a long term jail and make them suffer the same way that the person they killed or did whatever to suffered.
The death penalty should never be used the arguments are moot when we can not prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that the crime was committed by the accused and even if there is 100% proof of guilt, the death penalty should not be used. Should it be allowed to have the authority to kill a human being that could possibly be innocent most agree that it is not right to have the death penalty in all countries. Death penalty the death penalty is different from all other forms of punishments in that it cannot be reversed and therefore should be abolished murderers are not discouraged from committing crimes even with the death penalty as a punishment.
Finally, opponents of capital punishment argue that empirical reality disproves some of the arguments of defenders of the death penalty there is no proof that the death penalty or long prison sentences have a strong deterrent effect crime rates are no lower in countries with death penalty. The death penalty is applied at random the death penalty is a lethal lottery: of the 15,000 to 17,000 homicides committed every year in the united states, approximately 120 people are sentenced to death, less than 1.
Based on this death penalty issue, i believe that it is somewhat a good way for criminals to be aware of there actions they should understand that there is a major consequence after committing a crime. The death penalty should be abolished because there is no evidence it will reduce crime rates there is no evidence that posits the use of the death penalty as being causal to a reduction in crime according to the nc coalition for alternatives to the death penalty , the murder rate for the state of north carolina actually declined following a halt in utilizing execution as a form of punishment. Why should death penalty be legal death penalty is a capital punishment done to criminal and murderers some countries consider death penalty as legal but for some, it is a mortal sin. Should the death penalty be banned as a form of punishment yes| no| 1 financial costs to taxpayers of capital punishment is several times that of keeping someone in prison for life 2 it is barbaric and violates the “cruel and unusual” clause in the bill of rights 3 the endless appeals and required additional procedures clog our court system 4.
This way it will teach them a lesson and they will hopefully not do it again whereas in places that the person contentiously does hurt people will then be thought about having death penalties as that will be a sensible choice.